Legal Opinion
Wimer v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1993No. 19209PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment to the State of Idaho and against Forrest Wimer and Jack Hodge. Wimer and Hodge brought an action under the Idaho Tort Claims Act (ITCA) for damages against the state and two officers of the Department of Fish and Game, Mel Hedberg and William Snow, after the plaintiffs were investigated for killing elk illegally in Idaho County. No charges were filed against Hodge as a result of the investigation, but Wimer was prosecuted on four charges. A jury acquitted Wimer of illegally killing elk in a closed area, but he was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Boose v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Ronald Pooler v. United States of America. Ronnie Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- People v. CamarellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Czaplicki v. Gooding Joint School District No. 231Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Manuela Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Waskey v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Wyatt v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.