Finch v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceStolz, Judge
The factual statements contained in the majority and dissenting opinions require no further elaboration. Suffice it to state that, at the conclusion of the defendant’s counsel’s questioning of the jurors, he made a motion for a mistrial, but he did not make a challenge to the poll of jurors. This was the defendant’s remedy in the situation with which he was confronted. Fields v. State, 190 Ga. 642 (2) (10 SE2d 33); Hill v. State, 221 Ga. 65 (1, 2) (142 SE2d 909); Hagans v. State, 77 Ga. App. 513 (48 SE2d 700). This remedy, like many others available to litigants in our courts, may be waived…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Doyal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Nolan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Thompson v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.