Legal Opinion
Teradata Corporation v. SAP SE
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 15, 2020No. 3:18-cv-03670Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 TERADATA CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 18-cv-03670-WHO 5 Plaintiffs, CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER v. 6 7 SAP SE, et al., Defendants. 8 9 BACKGROUND 10 There are five patents asserted in this case. All the patents relate to computer-implemented 11 database systems. Generally, all of them are related to data storage, organization, retrieval, 12 analysis, or removal. 13 The ʼ179 Patent (Patent Number 7,617,179, issued November 10, 2009), is titled “System 14 and Methodology for Cost-Based Subquery Optimization Using a Left-Deep…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.