Legal Opinion

Prinz v. Schmidt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1929No. 18983. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Prinz, Eliza Urban and Eva Smeberg filed their bill in the circuit court of Cook county to contest the will of Phillippine Schmidt on the ground of mental incapacity and undue influence. Upon issue being joined the cause was heard by a jury, and at the close of the evidence the court instructed the jury that the question to be determined was whether the testatrix was induced to execute the will as the result of the undue influence of Johann Phillipp Schmidt. The jury returned a verdict finding that the instrument was not the last will and testament of the testatrix. A decree was entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. HenlineIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Norton v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Snell v. WeldonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Gregory v. RicheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Dowdey v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Crampton v. OsbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Powell v. BechtelIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hockersmith v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Mosher v. ThrushIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API