Legal Opinion

Peiser v. Bradbury

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1903No. S.F. No. 2501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

This appeal is from the judgment up on the judgment-roll alone. Mrs. Peiser, wife of the plaintiff, on May 1, 1889, purchased from J. Fisher Smith two lots in the city of San Francisco, for the price of seven hundred dollars each, and paid in full for one of the lots, and received a deed conveying that lot to her, and a contract to convey the other upon payment of the several installments of purchase money stated therein.

On June 21, 1889, she executed to one Griffin a deed purporting to convey to him both lots, and on June 24, 1889, Griffin executed a deed to defendant Bradbury,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stafford v. MartinoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bensinger v. DavidsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  3. Hiatt v. SeysterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Whittaker v. E. E. McCalla Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API