Legal Opinion
Spindelfabrik Suessen-Schurr, Stahlecker & Grill GmbH v. Savio S.P.A.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided September 6, 1991No. C-C-88-139-PPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ROBERT D. POTTER, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is a patent infringement action in which the Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants have infringed Claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 4,059,946 [hereinafter the ’946 Patent]. Plaintiffs’ Exhibit [“PX”] 273.
2. Subject matter jurisdiction, in personam jurisdiction, and propriety of venue are all admitted. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
3. Defendants have filed two counterclaims. The first is for a declaratory judgment that Claim 18 is not infringed, invalid, and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Padilla v. City of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Kolmes v. World Elastic Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1994