Legal Opinion
Arthur D’Amario, III v. Globe Photos, Inc.; Globe Entertainment and Media Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 3, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02001Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 ARTHUR D’AMARIO, III, Case No. 2:25-cv-02001-APG-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 GLOBE PHOTOS, INC.; GLOBE ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA CORP., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 5. 11 Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted on October 22, 2025. ECF No. 3. 12 The Court screens Plaintiff’s FAC under the same standard as it screened his original Complaint. 13 Id. at 1-2. 14 I. Plaintiff’s FAC Establishes a Basis for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Leticia Valdez v. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation Allstate Indemnity Co., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- J.J. Industries, LLC v. BennettNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Sutherland v. GrossNevada Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.