Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Rice

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1920No. 16017PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered June 17, 1920, denying a motion to vacate an order appointing a guardian, after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On February 3, 1920, one C. L. Brownell filed a petition in the superior court of Pierce county praying for the appointment of a guardian of the estate of Maynard Mayer. In his petition the petitioner alleged that Mayer had suffered a stroke of paralysis and was in a semi-conscious condition, un*145able to talk, unable to transact or look after Ms own business, and was then confined in one of tbe hospitals of tbe city of Tacoma, under tbe care of Dr. A. M. Flynn; that Mayer was then, and for a number of years prior thereto bad been, engaged in conducting a hardware business in tbe city of Tacoma;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lowary v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Stark Bros. v. RoyceWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Bouchat v. UphoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. In Re the Guardianship of TeetersWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Glesin v. KaplanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. McGill v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API