Legal Opinion · Dissent

EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1996No. 94-0843Published

1Dissent

CORNYN, Justice, joined by HIGHTOWER, GAMMAGE and SPECTOR, Justices, dissenting.

Whether jurors will be permitted to hear testimony on an essential element of the plaintiffs’ lawsuit, and accept or reject it, in whole or in part as they see fit, is the issue with which we are presented. It is not whether we as judges find such evidence credible or “reliable,” to use the terminology adopted by the Court. Determining credibility is uniquely a jury function. Although I share the Court’s concern about admission of unsupported expert testimony, see Havner v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc., 825 S.W.2d 456,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API