Legal Opinion

State v. Gurske

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2005No. 75156-1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

118 P.3d 333 (2005)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Samuel William GURSKE, Petitioner.

No. 75156-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 20, 2005.

Decided August 25, 2005.

Steven P. Martonick, Snyder & Martonick Law Offices, Pullman, for Petitioner.

Ann Colburn Shannon, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, for Respondent.

MADSEN, J.

¶ 1 Petitioner Samuel William Gurske contends that his deadly weapon sentence enhancement is invalid because the pistol found in a backpack in his truck was not readily available, and therefore he was not armed at the time of the commission of the crime of possession…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Johnson; Concurrence · Johnson.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API