State v. Gurske
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
118 P.3d 333 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Samuel William GURSKE, Petitioner.
No. 75156-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued January 20, 2005.
Decided August 25, 2005.
Steven P. Martonick, Snyder & Martonick Law Offices, Pullman, for Petitioner.
Ann Colburn Shannon, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, for Respondent.
MADSEN, J.
¶ 1 Petitioner Samuel William Gurske contends that his deadly weapon sentence enhancement is invalid because the pistol found in a backpack in his truck was not readily available, and therefore he was not armed at the time of the commission of the crime of possession…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Johnson; Concurrence · Johnson.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.