Legal Opinion

Liberal Savings & Loan Co. v. Frankel Realty Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

The plaintiff was a sublessee of the defendant, The Frankel Realty Company, of certain real estate. The other defendants are the owners of the reversion in fee simple. The plaintiff is still in possession of the premises, either by virtue of the sublease or by reason of holding over after its termination. This sublease is in writing. The plaintiff being doubtful of its rights in the premises filed this action in the Common Pleas Court for a declaratory judgment. The Frankel Realty Company filed a cross-petition for unpaid rent on the theory that the plaintiff was still holding under the terms…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boedker v. Warren E. Richards Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. WelshOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dillon v. GakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. State, Ex Rel. Squire v. WinchOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. First National Bank v. Kittoe Boiler & Tank Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wetzstein v. DehrkoopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Harbaugh v. UtzOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API