Legal Opinion

Souer v. De Bary

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1900No. 966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

1Per curiam

This case is now before this court for the second time. The opinion of this court on the first writ of error contains a full statement of the case. De Bary v. Souer, 41 C. C. A. 417, 101 Fed. 425. The case is now here on the same facts. No new material question is raised. It is well settled that questions once considered and decided by an appellate court will not be re-exainined on a subsequent appeal or writ of error in the same case. Railway Co. v. Wilder, 41 C. C. A. 305, 101 Fed. 198; Supervisors v. Kennicott, 94 U. S. 498, 24 L. Ed. 260. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. De Bary v. SouerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Wirtz v. NestosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Cogswell v. DrennenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921