Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Circuit Court of Henry. Tried before the Hon. II. D. Clayton.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The sole question in this case arises under statute No. 80, approved February 17,1885 — Sess. Acts, 139— which provides, “ That on the trial of all indictments, complaints, or other criminal proceedings, the person on trial shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent' witness; and his failure to make such request shall not create any presumption against him, nor be the subject of comment by counsel.” The accused in this case was indicted, with five others, for the crime of burglary; and all were on trial together, under their several pleas of not guilty. ‘‘Each of said other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brandon v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. State v. HuffNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  3. State v. CohnNevada Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State v. HorneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. State v. GigherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. Torrey v. BurneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  5. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API