Williams v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to- the Criminal Court of Record forDuval County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Carter, J.:
On December 12, 1899, an information was filed in the Criminal Court of Record of Duval county, charg*206ing plaintiffs in error, together with Sam Dixon, Essie Armstrong and Daisy Earle, jointly with the crime of robbery. On January 3, 1900, upon motion of the county solicitor, a severance was granted as to the defendant Daisy Earle, the other defendants were placed on trial jointly, and the jury rendered a verdict of guilty as to plaintiffs in error and Essie Armstrong and not guilty as to Sam Dixon. Sentences were imposed on plaintiffs in error and they sued out this writ of error.
I.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Benson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- State v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873
- Richards v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. BarrowsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Killingsworth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Stephens v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Kinnard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.