Legal Opinion
Rotoli v. Domtar, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. *935Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting the motion of S & K Trans., Inc., and DeCato Brothers, Inc. (defendants), for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this personal injury action against them based on the defense of workers’ compensation. Supreme Court held as a matter of law that Daniel J. Rotoli (plaintiff) was acting as a special employee of defendants at the time of his injury.
The court properly found that defendants sustained their initial burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Olsen v. We'll Manage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Eagen v. Harlequin Books Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Garner v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Burdette v. Niagara County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. Baldwin Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Hintze v. Brookhaven National LaboratoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- O'Connell Electric Co. v. Murnane/KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Gaynor v. Cassone Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Thomas J. Waltos v. United States of America; United States Postal Service; and Jane Doe, in her official capacity as a United States Postal Service EmployeeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026