Legal Opinion
Eagen v. Harlequin Books Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously *936reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the action is barred by the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation benefits. It is undisputed that William Eagen (plaintiff) reported to work each day at defendant’s distribution center, punched in a time clock, and was supervised in his work by various employees of defendant. The work performed by plaintiff was for the benefit of defendant. His general employer, Carrie…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lesanti v. Harmac Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Gardner v. Honda Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Milea v. Ames Department Store, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Smith v. Fishkill Health-Related Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martin v. Baldwin Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Younger v. Spartan Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Cox v. MaloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hintze v. Brookhaven National LaboratoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rotoli v. Domtar, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.