Legal Opinion

Rabinowitz v. Scandinavian Airlines

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 3, 1990No. 89 Civ. 8647 (WCC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CONNER, District Judge.

Defendant Scandinavian Airlines System (“SAS”) moves this Court pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment of plaintiffs’ claim for liability under the Warsaw Convention on the ground that plaintiff Tova Rabinowitz was not “in the course of embarking or disembarking” within the meaning of Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention when she allegedly sustained the injuries for which she seeks damages in this action. Plaintiffs cross move for summary judgment on this claim. Defendant further moves for summary judgment of the state law claim of negligence…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Benjamins v. British European AirwaysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kruger v. Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Coyle v. P.T. Garuda IndonesiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Ugaz v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  4. Alleyn v. United States District Court of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  5. Sassouni v. Olympic AirwaysDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API