Legal Opinion

Marriage of Sirek v. Sirek

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 2005No. A04-1353PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

In this dissolution proceeding, appellant challenges the district court’s award of marital real property to respondent. The district court found that appellant disposed of marital assets when he did not contest the cancellation of a contract for deed on the property and imputed the value of the property to appellant under Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. la (2002). Because it was an abuse of discretion for the district court to award the property to respondent based on the marital disposition statute, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Roger Sirek and respondent Carol Sirek…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Antone v. AntoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Marriage of Carrick v. CarrickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Marriage of Ebnet v. EbnetCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Chamberlain v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Stassen v. StassenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and Greg Wickenhauser v. Trust B of the Delmar C. Peterson Living Trust dated October 4, 1991, (A14-0428).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  2. In re the Marriage of: Nicole Ruth Sela v. Amit Yitzhak SelaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Katherina Theresa Bernhagen v. Peter John BernhagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API