Legal Opinion
James McHugh Construction Co. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 20, 2016No. Civil Action No. PX 16-1099PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Paula Xinis, United States District Judge
Pending in this insurance action are Plaintiffs and Defendant’s cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 6, 33). The issues are fully briefed and the Court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6 because no hearing is necessary. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is granted and Plaintiffs motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed. James McHugh Construction Company (“Plaintiff’) was selected to be the general contractor for the construction of a highrise apartment building at 360 West Hubbard in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Iko v. ShreveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Astarb v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Bethany Boardwalk Group LLC v. Everest Security Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Hamilton Jewelry LLC v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Jowite Limited Partnership v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Lighting Retrofit International, LLC v. Constellation Newenergy, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024