Legal Opinion

Dultz v. Velez

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 30, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1049 (FLW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOLFSON, District Judge:

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief against the New Jersey Department of Human Services and Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”) and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Defendants argue that Plaintiffs have no enforceable right under section 1983 and, in any event, this court should abstain under the Younger abstention doctrine. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Pla…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Democratic-Republican Organization v. GuadagnoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  2. Kadingo v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
  3. Thrower v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Maine Pooled Disability Trust v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  5. Me. Pooled Disability Trust v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API