Legal Opinion
Everett v. Clegg
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 19, 1956No. 36332, 36333PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
Headnotes 1 and 10 require no elaboration.
Where in an action for negligence the pleadings and evidence present a multiplicity of circumstances under which the plaintiff would be entitled to recover, and a multiplicity of circumstances under which the plaintiff would not be entitled to recover, and the trial court in charging the jury enumerates the circumstances under which the plaintiff would and would not be entitled to recover, the fact that the number of circumstances enumerated under which the plaintiff would not be entitled to recover is greater than the number of circumstances…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Stansfield v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Sizer & Co. v. Melton & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Molly Pitcher Canning Co. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Everett v. CleggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp. v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Lanier v. O'BEARCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Everett v. CleggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.