Legal Opinion
Lanier v. O'BEAR
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 21, 1960No. 38087PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
1. Special ground numbered 4 of the amended motion for new trial complains of the admission of quoted testimony, but does not show who the witness was. “The first special ground of the motion is incomplete and cannot be considered because the name of the witness whose evidence was objected to is not made to appear therein. See Trammell v. Shirley, 38 Ga. App. 710, Rule 10, page 714 (145 S. E. 486).” Holsenbeck v. Arnold, 75 Ga. App. 311, 312 (43 S. E. 2d 348). Therefore, this ground of the amended motion for new trial cannot be considered.
2. In special grounds 6 and 7 error is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Jones v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Langran v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Ray v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jackson v. CO-OP CAB COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Avant Trucking Co. v. StallionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Hughes v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Williams v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.