Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. State of NY
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) brings this motion to reargue the Court’s decision that its claims are barred by the Tax Injunction Act, that the Eleventh Amendment bars its claims against the State of New York, and that it lacks standing to bring this action. See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. State of New York, 718 F.Supp. 191 (S.D.N.Y.1989). 1 FDIC’s motion to reargue is based principally upon a provision of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub.L. No. 101-73, § 209, 103…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Smith v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Oneida Indian Nation of New York, Cross v. State of New York, Counties of Broome, Chenango, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oswego, Oneida, Onondaga, St. Lawrence and Tioga, Individually and as Class Representatives, Cross-Appellants. Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin and Oneida of the Thames Band, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. State of New York, Counties of Broome, Chenango, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, St. Lawrence and Tioga, New York, and Valentine Ryan, New York Electric & Gas Corp., St. Regis Paper Co., and Georgia Pacific Corp., Individually and as Class Representatives, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Main HurdmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hertz Corporation v. Avis, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Company v. FDIC as Receiver for Washington Federal Bank for SavingsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020