Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Burk v. Thuet

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1950No. 35,187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

Relator presented a verified petition to this court for a writ of quo warranto in the above-entitled matter. Upon said petition, this court issued an order to respondent to show cause why a writ of quo warranto should not be issued as prayed for in the petition.

Respondent had been appointed special judge of municipal court of the city of South St. Paul by the mayor of that city pursuant to M. S. A. 488.05. Relator brings this action to test the authority of respondent to act as such special judge.

Relator does not identify himself in this proceeding. There is nothing in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dowdall v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. State Ex Rel. Maffett v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Christianson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Wells v. Atwood.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Dahl v. FredricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Webb v. CianciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Webb v. CianciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Webb v. CianciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API