Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Webb v. Cianci

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 23, 1991No. 90-555-M.P., 90-560-M.PPublished

1DissentFay, Chief Justice

For the reasons stated below I respectfully disagree with the majority. It is my firm conviction not only that this court has the discretion to grant the standing of the petitioners, Floyd Edmund Webb III (Webb) and Joseph Vileno, Jr., et al. (Vile-no), to bring this appeal but that such discretion should have been exercised. The majority has fallen into grievous error by rigidly applying inapposite precedents to the unique factual circumstances of the case at bar. I shall demonstrate that a careful reading of constitutional provisions, statutes, prior Rhode Island cases, and persuasive…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Lawrence v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. Lerner v. GillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API