Legal Opinion

R.B. v. C.S.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1995No. Nos. CX-95-365, CX-95-527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*636OPINION

HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge.

Appellant R.B. (putative father) challenges the trial court’s determination that he lacks standing to bring a paternity action. Appellant C.M.A. challenges the trial court’s denial of her request for blood tests under Minn. Stat. §§ 257.55, 257.57, on grounds that it is in her best interests to know who her biological father is. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

C.M.A. was born out of wedlock on October 6,1993 in Fargo, North Dakota. Around the time of conception, respondent C.S. had sexual relations with C.M.A.’s mother. The putative father…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Roy Allen S. v. StoneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. STATE EX REL. ROY ALLEN v. StoneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re the Marriage of GallagherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. In Re the Marriage of GallagherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API