In Re the Marriage of Gallagher
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentTernus, Justice
I respectfully dissent. The majority has tried to bandage a broken relationship; the result feels right, but its legal basis does not withstand close scrutiny.
As a court, we must “ensure that the law will not merely change erratically, but will develop in a principled and intelligible fashion.” Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254, 265, 106 S.Ct. 617, 624, 88 L.Ed.2d 598, 610 (1986). Our decisions should “furnish a clear guide for the conduct of individuals, to enable them to plan their affairs with assurance against untoward surprise.” Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 375, 403, 90…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.