United States v. Nwokoro
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Onuoha Nwokoro appeals the decision of the district court to detain him prior to trial. He seeks reversal so that he will be immediately released on his personal recognizance. Consistent with the requirements of the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142, we conclude that a limited remand, not reversal, is necessary.
The Bail Reform Act requires that a pretrial detention order “include written findings of fact and a written statement of the reasons for the detention.” 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(l). There is no such order here. In United States v. Peralta, 849 F.2d 625 (D.C.Cir.1988) (per…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Charles A. SimpkinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Kani Xulam A/K/A Steven Barry Citron A/K/A Sereno CitronCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Carlos Peralta, A/K/A Jose MatosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Eric MunchelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- United States v. BikundiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. HassanshahiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. Paul Manafort, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BikundiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.