Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Edwards

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 27, 2012No. CR-11-0137Published

1ConcurrenceWindom, Presiding Judge

I agree with the majority’s analysis in Part I of the unpublished memorandum in which the majority holds that the State failed to meet its burden to establish that the initial patdown search fell within the exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment established in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Because the State failed to meet its burden of establishing that the initial search was constitutional, the remainder of the majority’s analysis is unnecessary. More importantly, I believe, contrary to the majority decision, that had *54the initial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Ex Parte HilleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API