Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Autozone, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided October 15, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00162Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM DICKENS and KARLA PLAINTIFFS DICKENS v. CAUSE NO. 1:18CV162-LG-RHW A-1 AUTO PARTS & REPAIR, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT EDELBROCK CORPORATION BEFORE THE COURT is the [279] Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Edelbrock, LLC.1 There has been no response. After due consideration, the Court finds no question of material fact for the jury. The Motion will be granted and Plaintiffs’ claims against Edelbrock Corporation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Hibernia National Bank v. Administracion Central Sociedad Anonima, Jorge Raoul Garcia Granados De GarayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Chavers v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API