Legal Opinion

Vecchia v. Town of North Hempstead

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 21, 1996No. CV 96-1061PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of Decision and Order

MISHLER, District Judge.

The Town of North Hempstead moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

Gary Della Vecchia (“Vecchia”) seeks “to re-open an earlier action commenced in this court under Case No. CV 88-2229” (¶ 5) and “a further award of attorney’s fees in connection with the action under Case No. CV 88-2229” (¶ 6). “The plaintiff commenced the action under Case No. CV 88-2229 (JM) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of a property interest without due process of law” (¶ 7).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Crest Street Community Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. MillsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. Dillard v. Baldwin County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  3. West v. MansonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  4. Fauntleroy v. StaszakDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
  5. Ahmed v. Town of Oyster BayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API