Legal Opinion
Mayor of Morristown v. Hamblen County
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions
FROM HAMBLEN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamblen County. — Hugh Gr. Kyle, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
Chapter 501 of the Acts of 1911, section 1, as amended by chapter ‘2 of the Acts of 1913, provides that:
“For cities standing on a population basis within which falls Morristown it shall be lawful for the legislative body of said cities or towns, upon petition signed by the owner or owners of fifty-one per cent of the frontage of the lots or parcels of land on such portion of any street, highway, or alley, as set out in the petition, within the corporate limits of said city or town, not less than one block or the space between two cross streets in length, to provide by resolution or ordinance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. HoarU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1821
- Arnold v. Mayor of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Pittsburg v. Sterrett Subdistrict SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Jones v. TathamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- City of Clinton ex rel. Thornton v. Henry CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- American Can Co. v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Davidson County v. HarmonTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. McConnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Carriger v. Mayor of MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.