Legal Opinion

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Curley

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 20, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-484-APublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

This is a diversity action on a guaranty. Plaintiff Chrysler Credit Corporation (“Chrysler”) seeks recovery from a group of five guarantors of an automobile dealership. Default judgments have been entered against three of the five. 1 The remaining two guarantors are defendants Edward and Barbara Curley. Before the Court are plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the Curleys on the entire indebtedness of the dealership and the Cur-leys’ motion for partial summary judgment as to one aspect of the dealership’s liability. Centra] to the disposition…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gambo v. Bank of MarylandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Topical Jewelers, Inc. v. Nationsbank, NaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Barnette v. Brook Road, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Thompson MacHine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API