Legal Opinion
Ematrudo v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, husband and wife, to recover compensation for a certain operation of plastic surgery performed upon the face of John Gordon, the husband. The plaintiff seeks to charge the defendant John Gordon directly for the services rendered to him at his request, and also to charge Frances E. Gordon, his wife, by force of General Statutes, § 5275, which provides that both husband and wife “shall be hable for the reasonable and necessary services of a physician rendered the husband, wife or their minor child,” etc.
The trial court found that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Shelton v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
- Fitzmaurice v. BuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Woodruff v. PerrottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Churchward v. ChurchwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Delevett v. DelevettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Howd v. MacGregorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Dubow v. GottinelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.