Legal Opinion
Dubow v. Gottinello
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The undisputed facts of this case are that the plaintiff was the proprietor of a hay, grain and feed business, and the defendant Sebastiano Gottinello owned and conducted a teaming and contracting business, using therein one or more horses of his own. He carried on this business for a livelihood and the income therefrom was used by him in the support of his wife and family. The defendants were married on or after April 20th, 1877. Between December 14th, 1925, and July 7th, 1928, the plaintiff sold the defendant husband hay, grain and feed of the reasonable value of $875.91 for the feeding and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hyman v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Fitzmaurice v. BuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Buckingham v. HurdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Chamberlain v. TownsendOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Howland Dry Goods Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cyclone Fence Co. v. McAvineySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Sandelli v. DuffySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Mayflower Sales Co., Inc. v. TiffanySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938