Legal Opinion
Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 12, 1987No. 86-5210PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
In this civil rights action, Pace Resources, Inc. (“Pace”) seeks to recover damages for the alleged loss of use of a parcel of real estate owned by it in Shrews-bury Township (“the Township”) during a period in which it successfully challenged certain land use restrictions of the Township in a state proceeding. Pace alleges that the Township’s restrictions on land use have violated the taking clause of the Fifth *1025Amendment and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the Township, accordingly, should be held accountable for the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Paul Natale Wendy Natale Jarrod Natale v. Town of Ridgefield Ridgefield Planning and Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.