Legal Opinion

Spoolan Realty Corp. v. Haebler

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Findings were made at the trial concerning the facts in dispute. On the legal propositions involved, I hold as follows:

1. The agreement, providing for an advance by the seller to the purchaser on the construction by the latter of a building on the property sold, and for a consolidated first mortgage on the property, is more than the ordinary undertaking to make a loan for breach of which there is an adequate remedy at law.

The agreement, sought to be specifically enforced, is part and parcel of a contract for the sale of real estate, fully performed by the purchaser. The seller, who agreed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Johnson v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Trimboli v. . KinkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Brown v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Bostwick v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Destiny USA Holdings, LLC v. Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Bregman v. MeehanNew York Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API