State v. Roth
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentNeill, J.
(dissenting) — RCW 8.25.070 states: “. . . the court may award the condemnee reasonable attorney’s fees *717. . if certain conditions are present. There must be (1) a trial for fixing the amount of compensation and (2) an offer by the condemnee to stipulate to an order of immediate possession of the property being condemned. These two conditions then must be followed by any one of three other conditions: (1) the state has failed to make a written offer within 30 days prior to trial; or (2) the judgment exceeds the offer by more than 10 per cent; or (3) the trial court finds that the state has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Ropo, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Pacific Northwest Alloys, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- King County Employees' Ass'n v. State Employees' Retirement BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.