People v. Christensen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny, and she appeals from the judgment therein rendered, and from an order refusing a new trial. It is primarily claimed in her behalf that the evidence is entirely insufficient to support the verdict. The record shows very clearly that the defendant was positively identified by the prosecuting witness as the person who stole his money, although he was somewhat intoxicated at the time, and Annie O’Farrell, a witness for the defendant, although she positively swears that the defendant stole nothing, nevertheless states that she, the defendant,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. GolshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.