Legal Opinion
International Union v. Aluminum Co. of America
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 22, 1996No. 94-CV-0966PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the International Union UAW, UAW Local 1050 and Local 808 and the class of retired workers, 1 and defendant, Aluminum Company of America (“Alcoa”), have cross-moved for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ claims. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
I. Factual Background
The International Union UAW and its Locals 1050 and 808 have represented the hourly employees of Alcoa’s Cleveland and Vernon, California plants for many…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Barton Willoughby, D/B/A Willoughby FarmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Robert L. Musto v. American General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schreiber v. Philips Display Components Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Bender v. Newell Window Furnishings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Jack Reese v. CNH America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Reese v. CNH America LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Sloan v. Borgwarner, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.