Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Norman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Floyd Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, C. J.

The appellees in this case sued the appellant upon three promissory notes, executed by him, payable to them as administrators of the estate of John B. Norman, deceased. Each of the notes contained a provision that if it had to be collected by law, the judgment of the court should include a reasonable attorney’s fee for bringing the suit and collecting the amount due. The complaint was in three paragraphs, one upon each note. In each paragraph, there was an allegation of the value of the attorney’s fee, and that the note was due and unpaid.

Separate motions were filed to require a division of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Muncie National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Billingsley v. DeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Estep v. EstepIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Smith v. SilversIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Johnson v. CrosslandIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hilton v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Oppenheimer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smiley v. MeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Johnson v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API