Johnson v. Crossland
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.
This was an action by the appellees against the appellants on a promissory note for the payment of a specified sum of money, with interest, and attorney’s fees, if suit should be instituted on the note.
There was a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds, first, that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; second, that there was a defect of parties plaintiff, the attorney who claims fees should be a party plaintiff by name; third, that several causes of action have been improperly joined in said complaint; fourth, that the plaintiffs have not legal…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Oppenheimer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Smiley v. MeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Harvey v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Reynolds v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.