Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Crossland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was an action by the appellees against the appellants on a promissory note for the payment of a specified sum of money, with interest, and attorney’s fees, if suit should be instituted on the note.

There was a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds, first, that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; second, that there was a defect of parties plaintiff, the attorney who claims fees should be a party plaintiff by name; third, that several causes of action have been improperly joined in said complaint; fourth, that the plaintiffs have not legal…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Oppenheimer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smiley v. MeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Harvey v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Reynolds v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API