Legal Opinion

Foy-Proctor Co. v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 24, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

Appellees were engaged in the livery business in the city of Lexington and would when called on let and hire wagons and teams and a driver to -go with and use them: The appellant was engaged under a contract which it had with the city of Lexington in constructing a viaduct in the city, and one morning it, through its manager, called the office of the appellees over the telephone and in the conversation a contract was agreed upon whereby the appellees let for hire to the appellant a wagon and team which was composed of two mules, and a driver for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Tornroos v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson Excavating and Wrecking Company v. Certified Welding Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Pope v. CawoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Stock Yards Bank v. National Surety Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API