Legal Opinion
Parent v. Halter
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 18, 2001No. 00-03103-CV-S-1-SSA-ECFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment with suggestions in support, filed September 5, 2000. Plaintiff, Kathleen Parent (“Parent”), argues the administrative law judge’s decision that Parent was not disabled is not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Jurisdiction rests with the Court to preside over the present appeal because the record shows that the Commissioner issued a “final decision.” See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Supp. IV 1998). Defendant (“Commissioner”) filed a brief in support of the administrative law…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allen R. Prosch v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Loyce McCoy v. Richard S. Schweiker, Clifford M. Stack v. Richard S. Schweiker, James D. Desedare v. Richard S. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Viola BROWNING, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kokal v. MassanariDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Cherry v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
- Keenan v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2003