Legal Opinion · Concurrence

X.O.P. v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 27, 2014No. CV-13-928Published

1ConcurrenceLarry D. Vaught, Judge

I agree that this juvenile case can be affirmed, but I write separately to more fully distinguish the case of Martinez v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 182, 432 S.W.3d 689.

Appellant was charged with rape under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-14-103(a)(1) (Supp.2011), which has two basic elements: (1) sexual intercourse or deviate sexual activity; (2) by forcible compulsion. Both sexual intercourse and deviate sexual activity require penetration. The sexual-assault statute that the majority has held to be applicable here requires 17(1) sexual contact; (2) by forcible compulsion. Both parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valdez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API