Legal Opinion

Valdez v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1991No. CA CR 90-111PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

The appellant, Daniel Valdez, was adjudged a delinquent juvenile by the Franklin County Juvenile Court on a finding that he was guilty of theft of property. As a juvenile offender, appellant was committed to the Division of Children and Family Services/Youth Services Center. On appeal, appellant contends that, due to the enactment of the Juvenile Code of 1989, he was entitled to a jury trial below. We find no merit in this contention and affirm.

The Juvenile Code of 1989 is codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-301 etseq. (Supp. 1989). A “delinquent juvenile” is described as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Elkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re L.M.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State ex rel. D.J.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. State ex rel. A.J.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Garnette BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Mark Burrough, Garnette Bell, Individually and as Next Friend of Kenyatta WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API