Legal Opinion

Penner v. Geller

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 23, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The maximum rent heretofore established for the dwelling space involved herein continues in effect until changed by the Housing Expediter (Controlled Housing Rent Regulation, § 4, as amd.). Where there is a decrease in the minimum services to which the tenant is entitled, his remedy is by appropriate application to the expediter under paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) and paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of section 5 of the ‘ rent regulation for a corresponding reduction of the maximum rent. There can be no recovery for penalties or damages in the absence of a refund order. (Cf. Woods v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woods v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weiderman v. RecklinghausenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Serxner v. ElgartNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Maddox v. Arch Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Mortenson v. McCredieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. Bronx Square Realty Corp. v. WurmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API