Legal Opinion

Stone v. Bowling

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1935No. 4-4047PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Judgment was rendered in this case in a justice of the peace court. There was no appeal from the original judgment.' Garnishment was issued out of the justice of the peace court and served on the Bank of Salem to require the bank to answer and account for funds alleged to be held by it as belonging to the appellant, W. J. Stone. Stone filed a statement or answer, in the garnishment proceeding, setting up that the money he had on deposit in the Bank of Salem was part of the proceeds from the sale of his homestead in said county, and that it was on that account exempt from seizure. This claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wooten v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Beeson v. ByarsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Sublett v. SublettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Cartwright v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Mid-Continent Life Insurance v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Burns v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API