Carroll Weir Funeral Home, Inc. v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether appellant is entitled to any part of the funds paid over by the state for the appropriation of property which it had occupied as lessee.
A lessee has a property right in the leasehold and, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, is entitled to compensation if it is appropriated by eminent domain. See Foote v. City of Cincinnati, 11 Ohio 408. However, there is nothing to prevent the parties from changing their respective rights by agreement. A lessor and lessee may, by including a properly worded provision in their lease, provide that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. Sharpless v. ArnesonHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- Van Patten v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v. KylbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- ISHA, Inc. v. RisserOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Miller v. Cardinal Care Mgt., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Dana Corporation v. Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust, Intervenor-Appellant, Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Jones v. NorwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.