Legal Opinion

Septagon Construction Co. Inc.-Columbia v. Industrial Development Authority

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2017No. WD 79474, (Consolidated with WD 79489)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE

Stockman Construction Corp. appeals the summary judgment in favor of the Moberly Defendants1 on Stockman’s claims seeking relief for the failure of the Moberly Defendants to obtain a public works payment bond, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. The City and the EDC cross-appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion for costs incurred. The judgment is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 2010, Mamtek US, Inc. sought financing and incentives to construct a sucralose manufacturing facility in Moberly (Mam-tek Project). The EDC worked…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. L.A.C. Ex Rel. D.C. v. Ward Parkway Shopping Center Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Turner v. School District of ClaytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Gill Construction, Inc. v. 18th & Vine AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. St. Louis Housing Authority v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rail Switching Services, Inc. v. Marquis-Missouri Terminal, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Pemiscot County Port Authority v. Rail Switching Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Green Street 2900 Investors, LLC v. The St. Louis Woodworks, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City v. Benefit Management Consultants, Inc., Carthage R-9 School District, and Gerber Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API